Blog

LAPITEC S.P.A. Produces Dangerous Artificial Stone Products Under the Guise of Environmental Friendliness

Lapitec S.p.A., an Italian company nestled in the heart of Veneto and affiliated with the Breton Group, has positioned itself as a pioneer in the production of sintered stone—a composite material celebrated for its resilience and aesthetic appeal. Founded in 1989 by Cavalier Marcello Toncelli, Lapitec has dedicated years to scientific research, culminating in the production of its first slab in 1999. The company's advancements, including the introduction of the world's first sintered stone slabs with through-body veining, underscore its commitment to innovation. However, beneath the surface of these achievements lie practices that warrant scrutiny, particularly regarding the handling of materials that pose health risks.

Lapitec's entry into the U.S. market, marked by partnerships with distributors like CaraGreen, was part of its strategy to solidify its presence in North America. The company's marketing efforts have highlighted the unique qualities of its products, emphasizing their full-body composition and natural elements, devoid of resins or digital printing. These characteristics, Lapitec contends, set its sintered stone apart, offering unparalleled versatility and environmental friendliness.

However, the company's approach to safety, especially in relation to its Safety Data Sheet (SDS) issued in 2020, raises significant concerns. The document's declaration that it does not qualify as an SDS under EC Regulation No. 1907/2006 (REACH) due to the product being considered an "article" is misleading. This classification suggests that the product, under normal use conditions, does not expose users to hazardous chemicals. Yet, the acknowledgment within the same document that cutting or milling the material—processes integral to its application—can generate dust containing silica contradicts this classification. This indicates a failure to adequately address the risks associated with silica exposure, a known cause of silicosis, a lung disease resulting from inhaling silica particles.

Moreover, the SDS's guidance on protective measures during machining is insufficient and potentially misleading. Statements suggesting that exposure to and the need for preventive protection against crystalline silica dust are only necessary during machining, and the assertion that diseases like silicosis develop only after prolonged exposure, are both deceptive and dangerous. They underestimate the risks posed by silica dust, which can remain airborne and pose a hazard long after machining has ended. Furthermore, the document's advice on respiratory protection is vague and inadequate for preventing silicosis, undermining worker safety.

In recent communications, Lapitec has claimed to have achieved a silica-free manufacturing process, a statement that appears to be at odds with the information provided in their own safety documentation. This discrepancy raises questions about the accuracy of the company's public statements and the reliability of the information it provides to consumers and workers alike.

Lapitec's efforts to capitalize on regulatory changes, such as Australia's ban on artificial stone products containing crystalline silica, by promoting its product as a "silica-free" alternative, further complicate the narrative. These marketing strategies, which hinge on the purported safety and environmental benefits of Lapitec's products, must be critically evaluated in light of the company's own safety disclosures.

The discrepancies between Lapitec's marketing narratives and its safety practices highlight a concerning gap in corporate responsibility. While innovation and market expansion are commendable goals, they should not come at the expense of transparency and the well-being of workers and consumers. It is imperative for companies like Lapitec to align their practices with their proclaimed values, ensuring that their contributions to the industry are not only innovative but also ethically sound and genuinely safe.